Market comparison
Comparing the property against evidence from similar properties, adjusting for the differences that matter: location, area, condition, date. The most-used approach where genuinely comparable evidence exists.
Valuation
Inheritance and transactions
Supporting services
The point of a methodology is that the conclusion can be understood and discussed — not simply a figure you are asked to take on trust.
Before looking at the property, these are settled: the identity of the property, who is instructing, the purpose of the valuation, the institution the report will go to, the required valuation date, and the scope of the work.
These are not formalities. A report for a settlement between heirs and a report for bank security can concern the same property and differ in depth, in form, and even in the basis adopted.
The documents requested are those that establish the property's identity, characteristics and legal position. The list is not the same for every file; it varies with property type and purpose.
Documents requiredWhere an inspection forms part of the work, the property's physical characteristics, its surroundings and the factors bearing on value are recorded: actual condition, build quality, access, noise, outlook, current use, and everything that shows on site and on no document.
An inspection is not a quick visit to take photographs. It is a data-gathering stage, and its findings feed the analysis rather than sitting in an appendix.
For some properties — land and development sites especially — it is essential to understand both the current use and the use that is possible within the planning and technical constraints.
Land used as a yard while its zoning permits residential development is not worth what a yard is worth. The gap between existing use and best possible use is a central element of value.
Depending on the property and the quality of the data, different approaches may apply:
Where more than one approach is used, the results are compared and weighted according to the reliability of the data and how well each approach fits the case.
The conclusion is not an average of the figures. The weighting is a reasoned decision: an approach built on strong evidence carries more than one resting on wider assumptions.
The report normally contains: definition of the instruction, description of the property, sources and documents, inspection findings, the methodology used and why, the analysis, the conclusion, and the assumptions and limitations.
No approach is applied mechanically. The choice is a professional judgement resting on the purpose, the property type and the quality of the available data — and it is justified inside the report.
Comparing the property against evidence from similar properties, adjusting for the differences that matter: location, area, condition, date. The most-used approach where genuinely comparable evidence exists.
Suited to income-producing property, analysing the revenue, the risk and the expected return. Its accuracy rests on the quality of the income data and how realistic the occupancy assumptions are.
Useful for certain buildings and assets where estimating replacement or reinstatement cost is the appropriate route, allowing for depreciation and obsolescence. Particularly useful where comparables are scarce, as with specialised facilities.
What it does is produce an opinion whose reasoning can be traced and whose every step can be questioned.
The file is reviewed first: documents required, scope of work, expected timeframe. No fee is quoted before that.